On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 01:08:18 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 20:12:52 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 October 2015 at 13:32:54 UTC, Atila Neves
wrote:
ever get approved. My original plan was to write a DIP for
"static inheritance",
I would be intersted in seeing a detailed analysis on the
difference between inheritance and "alias this" over the first
struct member.
No virtual dispatch, no downcast possible, no dynamic typeid,
...
Does this mean that static inheritance for structs can be done as
syntax sugar using "alias this" with no semantic changes and get
the same semantics as with a class?
E.g.:
struct MySub : MySuper {
}
translates into
struct MySub {
MySuper __super;
this(...){ __super.__ctor; ...}
~this(...){ ...; __super.__dtor;}
alias __super this;
}