Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 18:07:24 UTC, Shriramana Sharma > wrote: >> So, any thoughts? Any way this could be improved? Would be nice >> if that mixin got into the standard library somehow... > > Writing a mixin to create a standard constructor for exception > types is trivial. The problem is that you can't document code > that's mixed in. So, the constructors wouldn't end up in the > documentation. And while it's a bit annoying, copy-pasting the > two standard constructors for exceptions is pretty trivial.
Can't we just include the /++ +/ block within the Wysiwyg string in the mixin? Does DDoc not process mixins? Shriramana Sharma.
