I always wondered why DMD releases have a 0 in their minor version number -- surely 2.068 is the same as 2.68? Why then retain the zero?
Yeah consistent SemVer would be better.
On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 15:20:54 UTC, Shriramana Sharma
wrote:
- 0 in version number? Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version number? extrawurst via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version number? Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version number? Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version number? Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version number? Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version numb... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version... Israel via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in ver... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version numb... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version numb... Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d
- Re: 0 in version numb... Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d
