On Sunday, 18 October 2015 at 15:51:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-10-16 23:54, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Basically all of the usage of the "synchronized" keyword in DWT
is actually the synchronized statement. I found a couple of
more false positives where "synchronized" was part of a method
name. There are cases where not all of the methods contain the
synchronized statement.
Ah. I misunderstood then. I wouldn't expect there to be any
changes which would break synchronized statements unless we got
rid of synchronized entirely, which is unlikely.
- Jonathan M Davis
