On 20 October 2015 at 20:44, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 21:24:00 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> In order: >> You are responsible, the library maintainers (I chip in a bit on the side >> when I have the hardware / virtual environment). >> You are responsible, the authors and reviewers of the testsuite and >> unittests. >> > > Who is this "You", specifically? > > If I run into a bug with GDC on a specific platform/architecture, who am I > supposed to talk to? With DMD/Phobos bugs I can at least use "git blame". > > Also, are you saying that it is every Phobos/Druntime contributor's > responsibility to make sure that their changes are GDC-compatible? Other > than the Travis auto-tester which seems to be failing half the time, we > don't have any CI or any tests at all for GDC! > > What can I say? We have a lot of faith in our porters. :-) You can talk to me if you run into any problems, because I'm certainly more *aware* of porting and portability than most other druntime and compiler maintainers. However you submit to upstream.
