On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 06:38:08PM +0000, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Wednesday, 21 October 2015 at 18:14:39 UTC, jmh530 wrote: [...] > >Are you saying there isn't a reason to use static arrays? > > A static array is of a fixed size, which almost no other containers > are. It also lives entirely on the stack, which almost no other > containers do. [...]
You forget that static arrays can also be struct/class members, and in the latter case they are not necessarily on the stack. You do have a point that they are of fixed size, though, and as such are of limited use as containers. T -- "I'm running Windows '98." "Yes." "My computer isn't working now." "Yes, you already said that." -- User-Friendly
