On 22 October 2015 at 19:58, Rikki Cattermole via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22/10/15 10:49 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: >> >> On Thursday, 22 October 2015 at 01:50:08 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote: >>> >>> On 22/10/15 9:50 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >>>> >>>> Better late than later. >>>> >>>> http://wiki.dlang.org/Vision/2015H2_(draft) >>>> >>>> Destroy. After we make this good I'll rename it and make it official. >>>> >>>> >>>> Andrei >>> >>> >>> Can we add priority for color library for Phobos? >>> I really don't want to be held up during 2016H1 because of it. >>> With regards to image + windowing library. >> >> >> Has anyone come up with a proposal for review for possible Phobos >> inclusion? That's usually the holdup on that sort of thing, not a vision >> document. >> >> - Jonathan M Davis > > > Manu's work is more or less complete at this stage. > He just needs a bit of support to push it to the finish line :)
Well, I wouldn't call it complete, but the base could be merged into experimental. Further work should be additive. The question is, a library that could be expanded for years to come; should it be merged eagerly, or in years when it's 'finished' (a concept that's never actually attainable)?
