On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 09:49:00 UTC, Iakh wrote:
On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 00:00:45 UTC, anonymous wrote:
runBinary calls naiveIndexOf. You're not testing binaryIndexOf.
You are right.
This is fixed example:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f7a54b789a21
and results at dpaste.dzfl.pl:
-----
SIMD: TickDuration(151000)
Binary: TickDuration(255000)
Naive: TickDuration(459000)
So SIMD version ~1.68 faster than binary
At home with defult dub config "dub run --build=release":
-----
SIMD: TickDuration(350644)
Binary: TickDuration(434014)
Naive: TickDuration(657548)
~1.24 times faster than binary and
~1.87 times faster than naive
