On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 at 15:13:40 UTC, bitwise wrote:
[...]
I have to disagree with this. A function's meaning should not
change because it's definition is removed.
I suppose you are right.
[...]
A.foo() or B.foo() seems to work instead of super.super.foo()
or super.foo()
Ah, ok. I'll take your word for it(on my phone).
I'm wondering if it would be worth it to make a DIP for this.
We could sort out the details and discuss the use and ab-use
cases ;)
I myself would be a bit reluctant to start on the DIP right
this second though, as I don't currently have the
knowledge/time to back it with a proof of concept
implementation.
Bit
Yeah I was thinking about making a dip, but lots of dips get
made. Without a proof of concept implementation, most don't even
get considered. I have tried to look at dmd's source but have
really not been able to grok it. I sort of wish there was an
article written by Walter or some one that was a intro break down
of dmd internals, maybe with some examples of adding features.
