On Tuesday, 3 November 2015 at 20:28:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/03/2015 03:12 PM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:


Ditto. This needs `static continue` and `static break`. Without this functionality, the control flow in `static foreach` becomes very unwieldy.

"continue" and "break" (no static) should just work. -- Andrei

Depending on what you want `continue` and `break` to do. Consider this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/925e4aec6173

Note that the pragma gets compiled for `true` even though we `continue` before it. This is the expected behavior from `continue`, but a `static continue` should have skipped that, and a static break should have skipped the compilation of the rest of the AliasSeq.

Reply via email to