On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 16:31:44 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Sunday, 8 November 2015 at 13:48:30 UTC, Muktabh wrote:
Will it be a good idea to develop an opensource implementation
in D than C++, if I try to write it?
I mean, you can if you want to, but it would make more sense to
just make bindings to library for D. Rewriting everything for a
language in that language doesn't scale.
Also, in the future, please post questions like this to the
"Learn" page. Thanks.
Sorry for posting it in the wrong group, I was not aware about
the learn group.
We cannot make D bindings to it because it is a closed source
project by Google and only a spec like mapreduce will be
released, so I thought maybe I might try and come up with an open
source implementation. I was just curious if D would be a good
choice language for a library like this instead of C++ which is
used by Google.
