On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:02 AM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d < [email protected]> wrote:
> > We've been adding lazy versions of functions for years now, and we've > never removed the eager versions. And I'm pretty sure that Walter and > Andrei have generally been opposed to the idea of doing so precisely > because of the code breakage that it causes. We have been moving towards > using lazy range-based functions as much as possible and avoiding adding > new eager functions, but that doesn't mean that removing the eager > functions is worth the pain that that causes or even that the eager > functions aren't worth having. > > - Jonathan M Davis > Surely the eager functions should at least be using the lazy version internally? "more code, more bugs" is often a true statement (not always, but often).
