On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 02:21:04 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 November 2015 at 02:19:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli
wrote:
For once, let's take something from C++. ;) Structured
bindings are accepted for C++:
https://isocpp.org/blog/2015
Assuming that f() returns a tuple,
auto {x,y,z} = f();
will be the same as
auto t = f();
auto x = get<1>(t);
auto y = get<2>(t);
auto z = get<3>(t);
Ali
Kenji already wrote(and implemented IIRC) a DIP for this, I
don't think it was ever approved.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP32
I wish D had better Tuple handling at the language level.
I wish as well, but we have a lot on the drawing board right now,
I don'tt hink this is the time for that.
There have been proposal that are better than Kenji.
Grammatically, Kenji's proposal have some serious problems, { is
already the start of a delegate, a block statement, a struct
literal, and I'm not sure what else, but too much.
