On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 20:25:12 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
That syntax is the same as constructors... if that's what you want it to look like, we ought to actually use a constructor for all but the zero-argument ones which I'd use a static named function for (perhaps .make or perhaps .makeEmpty too)
While I think this would be nice and explicit, it's bad for generic code, which would have to specialize to correctly call the nullary version.
