On Saturday, 28 November 2015 at 21:49:07 UTC, BLM768 wrote:
Do we even have a good standard XML parser? std.xml has been languishing for years...
AFAIK, good json parser is still in a review queue together with std.xml2 :)
- Re: I hat... Chris via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Chris via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Chris via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Minas Mina via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... terchestor via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... BLM768 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Chris via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Chris via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate ne... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB... Gordon via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate ne... Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... terchestor via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB config form... Bruno Medeiros via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB config ... Kagamin via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB config format mattcoder via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB config form... H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
