On Saturday, 28 November 2015 at 22:00:32 UTC, Poyeyo wrote:Dubconf seems to me a good replacement name for the format.Hilarous, I guess you didn't read the topic at all...
To be fair, it's 20 pages long.
On Saturday, 28 November 2015 at 23:38:35 UTC, UserAbcabc123
wrote:
- Re: I hate ne... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB con... Mengu via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB config format Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB config form... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB config ... Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB config ... Poyeyo via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB con... UserAbcabc123 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB... rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate new DUB... Poyeyo via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate ne... tired_eyes via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hate ne... UserAbcabc123 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... UserAbcabc123 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Poyeyo via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d
- Re: I hat... Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d
