On 11/30/2015 3:42 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Exactly, the D module system would still be in place. Assuming they
were in defferent modules, then the D module system would keep them
out of conflict naturally, with rules identical to the normal D rules.
I imagined this;
No need to imagine:
"Namespaces create a new named scope that is imported into its enclosing scope."
-- http://dlang.org/spec/attribute.html#namespace
C++ namespace is for mangling, D module is for
scoping. That's not how it seems to be, so my intuition was dead
wrong, but my weekend's experience has convinced me it would be better
how I initially intuited.
What about:
file1.NS.X x;
file2.NS.Y y;
?
