On 12/1/15 9:56 AM, BBaz wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 at 14:50:24 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 12/1/15 9:17 AM, BBaz wrote:
However, I've spotted "bearophile". He has opened a lot of issues just
because he wanted this or that in std.range. I think that most of his
issues could be closed because he should rather discuss on the NG or
even propose an implementation on GH...
Open enhancements should be left alone IMO. Unless it has been decided
that there is zero possibility for them being implemented, they are
just waiting for someone to do it.
Enhancements also shouldn't count towards any open "bug" count.
I understand, but there are much...not 3 or 4 , more something like 20...
Anyway, message get, i'll post the list tomorrow.
Yeah, bearophile is like that, he has a lot of ideas ;)
Some of them have been implemented, after sitting for a long time. So I
don't think it's correct to close them. I'm all for closing ones that
absolutely won't be implemented though.
-Steve
