On Tuesday, 1 December 2015 at 14:45:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 12/1/15 5:31 AM, Luis wrote:
Being DUB very important for D language... why there isn't an entry for
DUB on ecosystem ?

Also, looks that DWT isn't very active. Not should be a "GUI" entry to talk about GtkD, TkD and other GUI toolkits, instead focusing on one
that looks that no body uses ?

PD: I don't know the true state of DWT, but GtkD and TkD simply just works.

I would discourage adding any more groups. I don't really get the point of having so many groups, if you have a question, use the main group or the learn group. That is where all of us are paying attention.

I (and I presume many other D veterans) wouldn't see any discussions on other groups. The fact that other groups have little discussion is likely evidence that having other groups isn't helping questioners reach answers.

I frequently go to a site with many categories for groups, and don't know where to post my question. I hate that.

-Steve

While I agree in general, the problem is that DUB has a dedicated forum "far away" from this forum. Sometimes, when people have a question, they don't know where to post it. Here or on the dedicated D forum run by Sönke. Now that DUB has become part of "official D", wouldn't it make sense to tie it in a bit better? Also, DUB questions are more frequent than GDC or LDC questions (not to mention DWT).

Reply via email to