On Wed, 02 Dec 2015 09:53:32 +0000, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 20:38 +0100, Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> > […] >> Not currently. dub.sdl is not ideal, because it would lead to >> ambiguities within the dependency graph, but dub.selections.json could >> be extended to support that. > > As Mathias pointed out putting the compiler choice in the dub.sdl file > is actually not a good idea. I think leaving the dub.selection.json file > as an automated file is probably best, it means it is disposable and > recreatable easily without fear.
You mean dub.selections.json isn't intended to be end-user-modifiable? I keep getting warnings about deprecated branch dependencies that say I should use a version tag and, if I really want a branch, edit dub.selections.json to make it happen. (This is mainly for ancient packages from before the semver times, most of which don't work at present.)
