On 12/04/2015 01:05 AM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
Also maybe a simpler idea would just be to annotate the the operations
with there complexity with UDAs. That way things that really care about
the complexity can get it, and those who don't can ignore it. It has the
benefit of being self documenting as well.
Well look at what the cat dragged in:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/711aecacc450
That's quite promising. The code is very preliminary and uses strings
for typical complexity values (e.g. "constant", "linear", and later
"loglinear" etc). I need to see how to integrate this whole idea.
Also an unpleasant problem is overloading - when present, user code
needs to specify which overload they're referring to.
Anyhow, this is really interesting. Thanks Tofu.
Andrei
