On Tuesday, 15 December 2015 at 08:26:44 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-12-15 08:07, deadalnix wrote:
[snip]
All of this is quite damaging to D's brand.
Even even though I'm not a webdev, I've been working in growth
for a
long time and these things matter. I don't know DDoc, and I'm
not sure
this is a very smart move. That raise the barrier to
contribute to the
website. The intersection of people that know webdev and DDoc
is just
mostly existent.
The time I can spend on this is quite limited due to SDC, work
and
personal life. Learning DDoc is just too big of a barrier. Yet
I can
provide support to anyone that is willing to help.
Last but not least, it wouldn't hurt to hire a designer to have
something slick.
I agree with all this, especially the last part about Ddoc.
We've all said time and time again if ddoc wasn't used for the
entire site more people would help with it. Ddoc makes sense for
the documentation but not everything else.
I thought Sociomantic were re-designing and sorting the site out?
