On Saturday, 19 December 2015 at 10:54:36 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-12-18 14:15, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
As I said: a growing number of people able and willing to
maintain and
improve it. -- Andrei
I'm not sure if there's some miscommunications here.
But more contributors will not magically help. There most be a
reason for why Ddox is not the default documentation. Some
features that are missing, some parts that are not good enough
or similar. There needs to be a list of criteria for when Ddox
can be made default. The contributors can work on these tasks
that will improve Ddox which will eventually lead to making
Ddox default.
I'm asking for specifics. If nobody has the answer for this we
don't know why Ddox is not good enough. And if we don't know
that we can't really know that it's not good enough. And if
that's the case it could be made the default right now.
There is no definitive answer for when something is "good
enough", but to get you started:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox/issues
Note that many of these are essentially DMD JSON output
bugs/limitations.
