Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > Look down to > where it handles tuples (AliasSeq is the user-visible name for > what the compiler internally calls a tuple).
Ouch. So even if the terminology gets abolished from Phobos, it's still lurking in the compiler? > Slicing a tuple creates a new tuple that refers to the same > objects as the previous one. So it doesn't deep copy... but > remember this is irrelevant to any D program I realize that but just wanted to know whether the word slicing is used in this context in the same sense as elsewhere. -- Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953
