On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 13:30:47 UTC, Márcio Martins
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 07:45:14 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 22:39:45 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
wrote:
On Monday, 28 December 2015 at 21:43:35 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
[...]
Agreed
1. First paragraph was replaced by your variant.
2. Binary representation was moved to Slice type
documentation.
3. Small "Quick Start" was added, so new user will start from
`sliced` and `Slice`.
http://dtest.thecybershadow.net/artifact/website-76234ca0eab431527327d5ce1ec0ad74c6421533-081dd6e9e8b3810a143d0a5fcba8d60b/web/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_ndslice.html
Thanks!
Ilya
Fix English:
http://dtest.thecybershadow.net/artifact/website-76234ca0eab431527327d5ce1ec0ad74c6421533-bfed2500425eb407bf2c97fc72e8a0c5/web/phobos-prerelease/std_experimental_ndslice.html
If I am reading the code right, the number of dimensions must
always be known at compile time, right? Is so, I suppose it was
a performance-oriented decision and not an oversight, correct?
This package is performance oriented. In the same time it is more
flexible comparing with numpy.
Simple optimisation check:
Source: https://gist.github.com/9il/bc7966823d96557c566c
LDC disassembled:
https://gist.github.com/9il/47aea1621a9fba609869 (all functions
are inlined)
