Re: std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 16:51:26 UTC, Robert burner Schadek 
wrote:
please review

Two small doc issues on 
http://dlang.org/phobos/std_experimental_logger.html

"The LogLevel of an log call" -> "[...] a log call"

"[...] or The additional f enables printf-style logging" missing 
parts of a preceding sentence?

Bastiaan.