On 12 January 2016 at 08:03, Daniel N via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: > > 3) Reflection annoyance.
Oh god, I didn't think of that! But I'll definitely run into it soon enough. How annoying >_< Existing reflection systems will fail in this case, which would have otherwise worked just fine without modification. > Well, at least with my private-symbol workaround I can diminish the issue. Surely the fact that people are implementing machinery to undo the damage done is a strong indication that they don't want the feature. Please, can anyone produce an argument in favour...? Otherwise just accept that it was a bad idea and eject it into space. Why could anyone be attached to it?
