On 15 January 2016 at 23:50, John Colvin via Digitalmars-d < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Friday, 15 January 2016 at 08:15:50 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> On 15 Jan 2016 9:12 am, "Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> In this mindset D is certainly stable enough for production, it is not >>> beta software. DMD is the playground compiler, GDC the conservative but >>> solid one, and LDC the core production tool. >>> >>> -- >>> Russel. >>> >>> >> Thanks for putting it so eloquently, Russell. >> >> Iain. >> > > The difficulty is that gdc includes a lot of long-standing bugs that are > fixed upstream. > GDC is rarely a vanilla cut of the version it supports, and no one should be allergic to submitting backports of library or frontend fixes. It is afterall Boost licensed. :-)
