On Sun, 2016-01-17 at 12:39 +0000, rsw0x via Digitalmars-d wrote: > […] > It wouldn't be a very big change to just adhere to $DUBPPATH if > it exists, which seems to be your major gripe about Go vs Dub.
My gripe is that Dub is neither Cargo (doesn't have install, compiles in the project) nor Go (installs to a known place determined by environment variable, compiles to a known place – or a transitory place somewhere temporary). Currently I am favouring the Go way rather than the Cargo way. Obviously SCons and CMake have a far better story on all this making and installing, but they do not do dependency management. If Dub was changed to use environment variables to specify where compilation products went rather than just putting it in ~/.dub, and there was a way of installing executables to a place specified by an install variable, then things would be nicer. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part