Re: rval->ref const(T), implicit conversions

[bitwise via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 19 January 2016 at 18:30:26 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:

On 01/19/2016 06:43 AM, bitwise wrote:

Finally, this situation simply should not be this complicated. A ref param should accept an rvalue. @safety is a specific concern, and unless I'm annotating my code with @safe, I should be able to write it however

I want(within reason).

To quote a famous author: "Sometimes, an entire community can miss a

point".

This is one of those points.

It actually isn't.

Clearly, it is =)

   Bit