On Saturday, 23 January 2016 at 21:38:19 UTC, Igor wrote:
I feel like I am in the cave man times. I installed Dmd2 from scratch. VisualD x64 project would not compile due to libucrt.lib not being found.

Sorry you are having trouble. The Universal CRT and Visual Studio 2015 are very new and I'm sure there are still some bugs to work out.

Using Process Monitor, it seems that dmd is looking all over the place for libucrt.lib but can't find it. Check out sci.ini has some weird results.

I have installed some windows kits and sdk's for win 8.1 and win 10 but I do not remember all the details.

What I do know is that I have about 20 libucrt's in on my harddrive(global search).


1. The archaic sc.ini file gets things backwards. It uses VCINSTALLDIR before it is defined!


Well spotted but this case you are missing some details. VCINSTALLDIR is used at that point so dmd linking will still work for people who install using the zip file but run DMD through Visual Studio Command Prompts (which define VCINSTALLDIR). You'll notice LINKCMD is than replaced with a different value further along by the installer. The comments could be better to explain why it is this way.

It actually shouldn't matter if it's defined later though. My understanding is the environment variables aren't expanded as the config file is read. They all get read and set verbatim as environment variables. Windows expands them once they are used meaning VCINSTALLDIR would be set.

[snip]


Um, So, first off VCINSTALLDIR is used before defined!! Pretty basic bug here, should never have happened. Second, UCRTVersion is just wrong. I have no winv6.3 subdir. Windows 10 and VS2015 use some folder names like

C:\PF\Windows\Kits\10\Lib\10.0.10150.0
and
C:\PF\Windows\Kits\10\Lib\10.0.10240.0

We are using:

HKLM "Software\Microsoft\Windows Kits\Installed Roots" "KitsRoot10"

Then searching for the latest UCRT version in a subdirectory. That's probably where the bug is. This is brand new detection however so it might be buggy.

You can see how it works here: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/installer/blob/master/windows/d2-installer.nsi#L379

Would you happen to know a better way to do this?

[snip]

The installer should be modernized and provide path information and resolve dependencies properly before installing. It is clear that dmd was not designed for windows use.

We make updates to it pretty much every release cycle. We'd love some help making it bulletproof. Rock solid VS/Platform SDK detection is what we want but it's proved a bit trickier than expected (Microsoft has changed a few things up with different VS releases so there is not just one way to do it).

Reply via email to