On 3 Feb 2016 7:30 am, "Joakim via Digitalmars-d" < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 at 18:45:20 UTC, Nikolay wrote: >> >> I am porting LDC/phobos/druntime to NetBSD. Currently my patch is merged into LDC master. I have several questions about phobos/druntime and general workflow. >> As I can understand I should prepare pull requests for phobos/druntime master branches. LDC team will merge/cherry-pick changes into ldc branch from master later. Is it correct workflow? Because it means that I can’t check my patch: there is no dmd compiler for NetBSD + phobos/druntime master branches. > > > You're probably better off porting dmd 2.068 first (as it's the last dmd written wholly in C++), using it to compile dmd git master on NetBSD, then porting druntime and phobos master. Porting dmd to NetBSD/x86 is likely easy: simply follow what the other BSDs have done, as you did for ldc. >
I doubt it. Using ldc/gdc usually means that it's just the library you need to play with, not the compiler.
