On 02/03/2016 10:45 PM, maik klein wrote:
It might still be the case that I am missing something obvious here.
You're not. The situation with noncopyable types is similar to that in C++ pre-11: people could define them, but the stdlib implementation wasn't supporting them in all places possible.
This is not difficult - all we need is to figure which library primitives should support noncopyable types and change implementations accordingly.
Andrei
