On 2/4/2016 4:27 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The literal being used to compare the result was wrong (by 12 mantissa bits) in the first place.
Then the literal should be fixed, not degrade the test.
On 2/4/2016 4:27 AM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote:
The literal being used to compare the result was wrong (by 12 mantissa bits) in the first place.
Then the literal should be fixed, not degrade the test.