On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 04:54:15 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 at 04:50:04 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
For the most difficult/contentious issues, writing a DIP is
just another form of arguing.
Well writing code might be better, but writing a DIP is a
superior form of arguing to just plain grumbling as its more
constructive.
True. Just pointing out that for certain recurring issues, the
reason that people have fallen back to grumbling is because
some DIPs *did* get written, but were rejected for vague,
non-constructive reasons, with no (workable) alternative being
offered.
Which ones, out if interest ? And in your opinion were they
thought through ?
