On Sunday, 21 February 2016 at 00:52:13 UTC, bitwise wrote:
Am I crazy, or is this paper proposing the exact opposite of what would be needed to do chaning of ranges or extension methods?
That is a good thing.
I don't get how it would be useful at all to type f(x, y) and have the compiler call x.f(y) for me. Why would I ever not want to just use member invocation syntax?
Generic code cannot assume they exist. E.g. cbegin(x)
