On Wednesday, 2 March 2016 at 15:41:56 UTC, Piotrek wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 21:00:30 UTC, Erik Smith wrote:
[...]
My quick comments:
1. In my opinion it should not be called std.database, but
let's say "std.dbc".
This is because it looks like a wrapper over db clients.
Moreover one may say it's almost impossible to make a common
and effective interface which would work with all databases.
e.g. someone on Wikipedia argues ODBC is obolete (check "ODBC
today")
[...]
Looks good.
At least at a first glace it seems pretty similar to SQLite.
I'd like to take this api for sqlite-d.
Because it seems to fit quite naturally.
