On Friday, 4 March 2016 at 00:42:28 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/3/2016 4:29 PM, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
After linking each _DxxTypeInfo_yyyy__initZ symbol should have
a unique address,
so why are we using hash of type name as TypeInfo.toHash()?
I don't think this has anything to do with compacting GC. Is
there something I'm
missing?
Because when working with DLLs (shared libraries) there may be
more than one TypeInfo per type.
Hmmm, can we left _DxxTypeInfo_yyyy__initZ undefined in the
shared libraries?
