Re: Idea: std.build instead of dub and make-like tools

[Piotrek via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 16 March 2016 at 18:36:48 UTC, Mark Isaacson wrote:
From experience, it turns out that having a restricted language 
to specify your builds/dependencies is a very good thing. You 
really don't really want a turning complete language for this; 
it just makes it harder to reason about.

I agree that everybody has different experience. My, for example, 
is opposite.

1. Make and derivatives are unintuitive to use and lead to 
unmaintained mess.
2. Simple and descriptive formats like JSON means neverending 
demand for extension and alternatives (dub situation).

Piotrek