On Saturday, 12 March 2016 at 12:49:42 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hey all,
tl;dr: D's DIPs seem not maintained. A couple of ideas are
proposed to tackle this state.
[...]
+1
The formal process required for library additions to
std.experimental was a step in the right direction, IMO.
Rust also has well written document on this topic:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/README.md
I think you should structure your proposal as a DIP. For example:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP75
http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/Process
You also probably link it from the overview page
(http://wiki.dlang.org/DIPs).
BTW all documents describing formal processes (review, release),
design rational, etc. should be better organized.
