On Thursday, 31 March 2016 at 19:24:14 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Pretty much as per title. I has that in the back of my mind for a while. Would that work ?
I am not sure about that... I would rather have a completely new type (`set`) for this purpose.
Dejan Lekic via Digitalmars-d Fri, 01 Apr 2016 05:30:08 -0700
On Thursday, 31 March 2016 at 19:24:14 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
Pretty much as per title. I has that in the back of my mind for a while. Would that work ?
I am not sure about that... I would rather have a completely new type (`set`) for this purpose.