On 4/7/16 1:16 PM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Thursday, 7 April 2016 at 17:03:31 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
The length of data will tell you which data it is?
It tells me more than ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Between the length and the
index, I can at least get an idea of if there's a broken record or
broken code.
Sounds like code bloat for little gain.
It is already there, just discarded!
D's error handling does this a lot, and there's no reason good for it.
Useless RangeErrors (a segmentation fault would be more helpful!),
Can't you throw a segfault in the handler? The information is still
there on the stack, no?
-Steve
