On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 11:00:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
What do you propose that we do instead? We need all of the separate toImpl functions regardless of the name. Do you want to try and embed them all inside of std.conv.to with the name to? I expect that it's feasible, but it would royally suck from the standpoint of unit tests, since then either
If we do as H. S. Teoh is suggesting and go straight to marking as private, then there is no reason to.
