> I really like 'static' as the namespace, it would be awesome if it did not > just > contain 'meta' stuff. > > Could we lose 'pragma', 'typeof', unary 'is', 'typeid', '__traits'. > > It makes a lot of sense to just say to someone "if you want to do something > at > compile time, just check the 'static' documentation".
"just check the static documentation" Either very punny or Nirvana; imagine the language not being a moving target and Andrei not having to update TDPL every few weeks. Then again, I don't like giving the language critics a possible play on words: "just check the stagnant documentation" Justin :-)
