On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 14:33:42 UTC, tn wrote:
Maybe the name of the function should then be "writes" and/or "writesln" (instead of "print"), so that it can at least be found from the same place in the documentation as other related functions. The naming scheme would then also be consistent with the rest of the write/writef-family. (Here -s stands for "separated/spaced" just as -f stands for "formatted" etc.)
I really like this idea. Much better than just "print", and maybe even better than "dump".
