On Wednesday, 27 April 2016 at 04:48:30 UTC, xenon325 wrote:
I guess it's too late, but from what I gathered from the comments, main controversy is about the name but not the utility (e.g. Adam's `substr` vs `substring` argument).

I don't think it has enough utility to be added at all, if it is defined as printing with spaces.

If it is defined as printing to be human readable, then I'd take it, even if the first iteration uses spaces. Then we can expand it to do stuff like pretty-print objects.

Reply via email to