Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:Nick Sabalausky wrote:Sounds great! The lower-grained safeness makes a lot of sense, and I'm thrilled at the idea of safe D finally encompassing more than just memory safety - I'd been hoping to see that happen ever since I first heard that "safeD" only ment memory-safe.I can think of division by zero as an example. What others are out there?Casting away const/immutable/shared.
I think those lead to memory errors :o). Andrei
