On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 01:46:40 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Sunday, 22 May 2016 at 19:44:08 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
...
Well here's the rundown of some numbers. min_compress uses a
tiny window, big_compress was my original algorithmn but
modified to use 16k total for a window. reduced_id_compress is
the original except reduced to a 220 window and 2 byte constant
output. Along with the compressed outputs of each.
min_compress: [TickDuration(46410084)] 0.779836
big_compress: [TickDuration(47998202)] 0.806545
orig_id_compress: [TickDuration(59519257)] baseline
reduced_id_compress: [TickDuration(44033192)] 0.739894
1001 (original size)
72
testexpansion.s!(æεó▌æ╗int).så°Resulà≡Ñ╪¢╨╘ÿ¼É ↑─↑╜►╘fñv├ÿ╜ ↑│↑Ä .foo()
73
testexpansion.s!(ÅæεÅó▌Åæ╗int).sÅå°ResulÅà≡ÅÑ╪Å¢╨Å╘ÿżÉ₧├ÿÄ╜É╝▓ÿëåâ.foo()
67
tes╤xpansion.s!(ÇææÇóóÇææint)∙⌡ResulÇàÅÇѺǢ»Ç╘τǼ∩ë├τü╜∩¢▓τ².foo()
78
testexpansion.s!(æ2óCæ2int).så(Resulà0ÑH¢P╘ê¼É╘íñÖ├ê┤ÿσ║ñ¬├ê¼É╘íñÖ├êÉ1å).foo()
min_compress: [TickDuration(29210832)] 0.82391
big_compress: [TickDuration(31058664)] 0.87601
orig_id_compress: [TickDuration(35466130)] baseline
reduced_id_compress: [TickDuration(25032532)] 0.705977
629 (original size)
52 E.s!(à·è⌡àδint).så°Resulà≡ÖΣÅ▄╝╝ö┤ líd _Ög læ◄.foo()
61 E.s!(Åà·Åè⌡Åàδint).sÅå°ResulÅà≡ÅÖΣÅÅ▄Å╝╝Åö┤₧ç∞ÄÖΣ¡ó╠ïå╗.foo()
52 E.s!(ΣÇèèΣint)∙⌡ResulÇàÅÇÖ¢ÇÅúÇ╝├Çö╦ëçôüÖ¢Æó│².foo()
52 E.s!(à&è+à&int).så(Resulà0Ö<ÅD╝döl ┤í╝ ┴Ö╣ ┤æ9.foo()
If you want, you can give the test case for issue 16039 a try. It
produces 300-400MB binary, so it should be a nice test case :P
