On 5/27/16 12:40 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Exactly. And we just keep getting stuck on this point. It seems that the message just isn't getting through. The unfounded assumption continues to be made that iterating by code point is somehow "correct" by definition and nobody can challenge it.
Which languages are covered by code points, and which languages require graphemes consisting of multiple code points? How does normalization play into this? -- Andrei
