On Saturday, 28 May 2016 at 04:15:45 UTC, Manu wrote:
This is only true for the owner. If we had 'scope', or something like it (ie, borrowing in rust lingo), then the fat slice wouldn't need to
be passed around

Right, I agree - if we keep the slice just the way it is now, it all still works if you borrow correctly!

(BTW, I don't think we even need this to be strictly @safe, though it would be nice if it was tested, we could say @system getSlice and potentially change it to @safe later.)

Reply via email to